I’ve addressed this issue before, but then it had more to do with my amazement over the fact that so many people on dating apps are in an open relationship. Whatever your opinion is on that phenomenon, though: it’s nothing if not honest – as long as you make sure his boyfriend is in an open relationship too!
More and more labels seem to be added to the dating mix, however, such as ‘partnered’, ‘exclusive’ or ‘committed’. As these terms sound so out of place in the dating arena, you have to wonder why these qualifications are provided as options. When you label yourself as one of these three, what are you even doing on a dating application? And what the f**k is the difference between them? No, really… what? It feels like saying ‘in between jobs’, ‘I don’t work right now’ and ‘unemployed’ are different things too. Just so we’re clear: they’re not.
Some claim they’re only on there to meet people or to chat with someone beside their cat, but seriously… who’s kidding whom? It’s such a puzzle. How completely friend-deprived must you be, if you don’t have any non-digital person in your life you can talk to, forcing you to turn to dating apps to make new friends. It’s called Grindr… not Friendr!
People have a tendency to want what they can’t have – the grass being greener and all that crap – which is why people would rather date people that are, well… already dating other people. As it turns out, people that are spoken for make far better prospect partners, in bed as well as in business. Partnered people these days are considered to be the most eligible bachelors, even though they are – obviously –bachelors no more. It seems people have an unexplainable fascination for people that are unattainable.
To test how desirable an ‘out of reach’ tag really is, I conducted a little social (media) experiment and changed my online relationship status from ‘single’ to ‘partnered’, just for the fun of it. I simply wanted to see what would “Happn”. The results are as astonishing as they are depressing. The amount of guys that started talking to me tripled! Now, of course I know that it’s fake…. but they don’t! They actually think I’m in a relationship and as a result, they want me…three times more than they wanted me when I was classified as single, to be exact. Isn’t that weird? That’s weird, right? Yes, that’s weird.
Apparently, settled is the new sexy and single is the new shunned. And I’m suddenly finding myself having newfound sympathy for Lena Headey’s character in the season 5 finale of Game of Thrones…. Shame! Shame! Shame!
The reason I’m bringing this up is not because I feel sad about my dating prospects, but because of the parallels that can be drawn between dating and the job market. My prospects on the latter do make me sad. “You don’t have a job right now? Oooh… something must be wrong with YOU! Sorry, we’ll hire someone who already has a job.” The more available you are, the less likely people seem to be looking at you… for love as well as for labor.
Although I’ve known this to be true when it comes to dating – nobody is attracted to an overly eager-to-please, readily available softy, after all – I never suspected this to dribble down and find its way to the professional workplace. Irreversible as it seems, there appears to be no other way than getting into bed with this concept – pun intended. You’re available, capable and you can start right away? Nah… if only you were under contract somewhere else, preferably with a three-month notice, you’d be perfect! Apparently, in order to get something that actually is hard to get, you have to play hard to get.
Well, I’m in. It’s on! Let the games begin…